Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Factors predicting conversion from colon capsule endoscopy to conventional optical endoscopy—findings from the CESCAIL study

Original Submission
2 Nov 2024 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
12 Dec 2024 Author responded Author comments - Ian Io Lei
Resubmission - Version 3
12 Dec 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 3
23 Dec 2024 Author responded Author comments - Ian Io Lei
Resubmission - Version 4
23 Dec 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 4
18 Feb 2025 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Konosuke Nakaji
26 Feb 2025 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sergio Coda
7 Mar 2025 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anwar Ashraf Abouelnasr
22 Mar 2025 Author responded Author comments - Ian Io Lei
Resubmission - Version 5
22 Mar 2025 Submitted Manuscript version 5
24 Mar 2025 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Konosuke Nakaji
24 Mar 2025 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anwar Ashraf Abouelnasr
26 Mar 2025 Author responded Author comments - Ian Io Lei
Resubmission - Version 6
26 Mar 2025 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
28 Mar 2025 Editorially accepted
13 May 2025 Article published 10.1186/s12876-025-03828-9

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page