You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Metabolic outcomes in non-alcoholic and alcoholic steatotic liver disease among Korean and American adults

Abstract

Background

This study investigated the prevalence and causal relationships of chronic metabolic diseases (diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia) with steatotic liver disease (SLD), specifically metabolically associated alcoholic liver disease (MetALD).

Methods

We conducted a comprehensive analysis using cross-sectional data from the KNHANES from 2011 to 2021 and the NHANES from 1999 to 2020. Longitudinal data from 2001 to 2014 from the KoGES were used. Participants were categorized into the metabolic dysfunction-associated SLD(MASLD), MetALD, and ALD groups based on their hepatic steatosis index (HSI), including liver profiles, body composition, and diabetes, and alcohol consumption. Multivariable, including age and smoking status, logistic and Cox regression analyses were performed to assess the prevalence and incidence of chronic diseases.

Results

In both the KNHANES and NHANES cohorts, an increased HSI was significantly associated with a higher prevalence of chronic metabolic diseases. Longitudinal data from the KoGES cohort showed that MASLD and MetALD were significant predictors of chronic metabolic disease in both men and women. MetALD showed a higher hazard ratio for the development of chronic metabolic diseases than MASLD in Cox regression analysis.

Conclusions

This study highlighted the intertwined nature of SLD and metabolic health, with an emphasis on the role of MetALD. The significant association between MetALD and chronic metabolic diseases underscores the need for integrated management strategies that address both liver health and metabolic risk factors.

Peer Review reports

Background

Steatotic liver disease (SLD) comprises a spectrum of liver disorders that are characterized by excessive accumulation of fat within hepatocytes. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), including non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, affects approximately 25% of adults worldwide [1,2,3]. NAFLD has emerged as a major health concern owing to its increasing prevalence and detrimental impact on global health [4].

SLD is associated with various complications that significantly affect patient morbidity and mortality. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in patients with SLD, reflecting the profound systemic effects of the disease [1, 4]. Additionally, patients with SLD are at an increased risk of developing extrahepatic malignancies, liver-related complications, chronic kidney disease, and type 2 diabetes mellitus [1]. These comorbidities illustrate the complex and multifaceted pathophysiology of SLD and underscore the need for a holistic and multidisciplinary approach to management and therapeutic interventions to mitigate the extensive burden of the associated comorbidities.

Recently, the scientific community revised the terminology from SLD to steatotic liver disease (SLD) and proposed a new classification of SLD to reflect a more nuanced understanding of its multifactorial etiology and complex pathophysiology. The newly proposed categories include metabolically associated SLD (MASLD), metabolically associated alcoholic liver disease (MetALD), and ALD [5,6,7,8]. MetALD includes patients with SLD due to mild alcohol consumption [5]. A recent health checkup-based cross-sectional study in the Japanese population highlighted the prevalence of SLD based on the new nomenclature [9]. The study reported that MASLD accounted for the majority of SLD cases, with a prevalence of approximately 24–30%. In addition, MetALD made up about 5–7% of individuals, while ALD 2–3%. This refined classification system aims to better capture multiple metabolic and lifestyle factors that contribute to liver pathology, thereby facilitating more precise diagnosis and management strategies [5, 10].

Herein, we examined the associations and causal relationships between SLD and chronic metabolic disorders using community-based cohort data [11, 12]. We also analyzed the metabolic risks associated with MASLD, MetALD, and ALD in the context of chronic metabolic diseases using data from a comprehensive Korean cohort. By examining the prevalence and interplay of hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia in these different liver disease categories, we aimed to elucidate their unique metabolic profiles, particularly MetALD. Our goal was to form clinical strategies for the management of patients with SLD and provide a basis for tailored healthcare approaches. Additionally, this study underscores the importance of accurate disease classification to address the broader burden of chronic metabolic diseases, ultimately contributing to improved patient care and outcomes.

Methods

Study population

We conducted a comprehensive analysis using cross-sectional data from the 2011–2021 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) and the 1999–2020 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). The KNHANES datasets are publicly available on the KNHANES website (http://knhanes.cdc.go.kr) [13]. NHANES records are publicly available on the CDC website (www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/index.htm) [14]. All participants consented to the use of their information for research purposes. Both the KNHANES and NHANES datasets contain extensive information on health, nutrition, medical history, physical measurements, and laboratory results (Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2). Additionally, we examined the longitudinal data from the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study (KoGES) from 2001 to 2014 that included detailed records of health, diet, medical history, physical measurements, and laboratory results (Supplementary Fig. 3) [9, 11]. These datasets served as the basis for our investigation of the association between liver diseases, specifically variations related to alcohol consumption and chronic diseases such as diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia.

The KNHANES and NHANES datasets were preprocessed and merged into a single file, regardless of the survey year, using R software version 4.1.2 (Fig. 1A) [15]. The KNHANES, NHANES, and KoGES datasets were initially heterogeneous. To analyze with the identical source code (R language), we standardized the dataset by making the names and number of columns consistent. When calculating the daily amount of alcohol consumption to distinguish MASLD, MetALD, and ALD, we quantified the following information: (1) the alcohol content in different beverage types, such as beer and wine. (2) the amount and frequency of consumption. Clinical biomarkers are influenced by a complex interplay of genetic and environmental factors and tend to exhibit independence among features, making imputation-based approaches particularly challenging. Therefore, participants with missing values for key baseline characteristics, biochemistry, alcohol consumption, smoking status, and medication information were excluded from further analysis. The KoGES dataset underwent similar pre-processing, resulting in a single consolidated file. For the KoGES dataset, which is longitudinal data distinct from KNHANES and NHANES, participants who did not have at least one follow-up were excluded from the analysis. To examine the causality of chronic diseases resulting from steatotic liver disease, we developed separate models for diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia. Only participants with at least seven follow-up records (over 12 years) were included in the causality analysis to ensure robust longitudinal data for reliable inferences.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Associations between chronic metabolic disease and metabolic parameters. (A) Research scheme for data normalization, association, and causality analysis for the three cohorts. (B) Circos plot of associations between chronic metabolic diseases and metabolic parameters in the KNHANES cohort. (C) Circos plot of associations between chronic metabolic diseases and metabolic parameters in the NHANES cohort

Definition of chronic diseases and MASLD, MetALD, ALD

The presence of chronic diseases, including diabetes and hypertension, and the classification of healthy participants were determined based on whether a physician had diagnosed the disease at least once. Dyslipidemia was identified by either a physician’s diagnosis or the use of dyslipidemia medications.

A comprehensive score for SLD, incorporating liver profiles, body composition, and diabetes, provides an indirect assessment of MASLD. Most of the individual components, except for diabetes, are utilized to evaluate SLD, with their original value showing continuous distribution. Diabetes is used in the formula as a dichotomous value, present or absent. Steatotic liver status was assessed using the hepatic steatosis index (HSI), which was calculated using the following formula: HSI = 8 × ALT/AST + BMI + 2 (if diabetic) + 2 (if female) [16]. An HSI score of ≥ 36 was used to diagnose steatotic liver disease (SLD) in the Korean cohort, based on thresholds established in previous studies [16,17,18,19,20]. For the American cohort, an HSI score of ≥ 41 was used to diagnose SLD, based on two key considerations. First, we calibrated the prevalence of MASLD in the NHANES dataset, as defined by the HSI threshold, to match the prevalence observed in the KNHANES cohort (Supplementary Fig. 4). Second, we adjusted for the significant difference in BMI, which averaged about 5 units between the Korean and American cohorts. This adjustment is pivotal in ensuring that the threshold reflects population-specific characteristics, thereby enhancing the comparability and accuracy of our results across cohorts.

To classify MASLD, MetALD, and ALD among patients with SLD, daily alcohol consumption was utilized for further categorization. Men who consumed < 30 g and women who consumed < 20 g of alcohol per day were classified as having MASLD, whereas men who consumed between 30 g and 60 g and women who consumed between 20 g and 50 g of alcohol per day were classified as having MetALD. Finally, men who consumed > 60 g and women who consumed > 50 g of alcohol per day were classified as having ALD [5].

Collection of data and covariates

Demographics of participants with and without liver disease across were obtained from KNHANES, NHANES, and KoGES. Participants were stratified based on the presence or absence of liver disease. Demographic data are presented as mean ± standard deviation for continuous variables and as frequency and percentage (%) for categorical variables. To select the covariates, we conducted a comprehensive review of eight peer-reviewed studies [18, 21,22,23,24,25,26,27] that used logistic regression or Cox regression models with covariates. These studies were selected based on their relevance to the analysis of covariates in the context of steatotic liver disease and chronic diseases. The number of covariates used in these studies was 24 variables (Supplementary Table 2). A review of eight relevant studies revealed that six consistently included age and smoking status as covariates in multivariable analyses. The repeated selection of these variables across studies indicates their recognition as potential confounders. Accordingly, age and smoking status were incorporated as covariates in this study to improve comparability and ensure adequate adjustment for confounding. The table also shows the covariates included in the multivariate analyses of each study. To ensure a systematic approach to confounder selection, we used a directed acyclic graph (DAG) to identify variables for adjustment. The DAG helped to clarify relationships between variables and guided the inclusion of covariates in our analysis [28]. The final DAG is shown in Supplementary Fig. 5. The multivariable logistic regression model employed in this study includes two covariates. In the KNHANES dataset, there are 5584 cases of diabetes, 10,150 cases of dyslipidemia, and 14,190 cases of hypertension. Similarly, in the NHANES dataset, there are 1212 cases of diabetes, 4261 cases of dyslipidemia, and 4106 cases of hypertension. Given the considerable number of events observed in each dataset, the inclusion of two covariates is unlikely to result in model overfitting relative to the number of events.

To investigate the association between SLD and chronic diseases, we included variables related to liver damage, specifically AST and ALT levels, ALT/AST ratio, HSI, and alcohol consumption. Each of these variables was treated as continuous, and values were categorized into eight groups to examine the proportion of chronic diseases in each group. The KoGES dataset included precise information on daily alcohol intake in grams per day, enabling classification of participants into MASLD, MetALD, and ALD groups based on thresholds. In contrast, the KNHANES dataset did not directly provide daily alcohol intake but included data on annual drinking frequency and the average number of glasses consumed per occasion. To estimate daily alcohol consumption, we referred to the alcohol content of commonly consumed Korean beverages, calculating an average of 10 g of alcohol per glass (6.5 g for soju and 18.5 g for beer). Daily alcohol intake was then estimated by multiplying the annual drinking frequency by the average alcohol intake per occasion. Similarly, the NHANES dataset provided information on annual drinking frequency and the average number of glasses consumed per occasion. Unlike the Korean standard, the U.S. standard defines one drink as containing 14 g of alcohol, which was applied to estimate daily intake in NHANE [29]. For alcohol consumption, different grouping criteria were applied based on sex in accordance with MASLD guidelines and as follows: men were grouped into 0–30, 30–60, and > 60 g per day, while women were grouped into 0–20, 20–50, and > 50 g per day.

Statistical analysis

To assess the statistical significance of the differences in the characteristics between groups with and without chronic diseases, one-way analysis of variance was employed, and p-values were reported. Logistic and Cox regression analyses were performed to determine the prevalence and incidence of chronic diseases related to SLD. Multivariate logistic regression was used to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) for chronic disease prevalence, whereas Cox regression was used to calculate the hazard ratios (HRs) for chronic disease incidence after adjusting for selected covariates. All statistical analyses were conducted using R software version 4.1.2, and significance was set at p < 0.05.

Ethical considerations

The Institutional Review Board of Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (South Korea) approved the study protocol (IRB No. 20221201-BR-69-02-02). All research procedures were conducted in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. All participants volunteered and provided written informed consent before enrollment, and their records were anonymized before being accessed by the authors.

Results

Baseline characteristics of the participants

The general characteristics of the participants in the KNHANES, NHANES, and KoGES cohorts according to steatotic liver status are summarized in Tables 1 and 2, and Supplementary Table 1. The KNHANES cohort included 22,597 healthy men and 7,017 men with steatotic liver. Among men with steatotic liver, most were categorized under MASLD (n = 3,494), followed by ALD (n = 2,980) and MetALD (n = 543) (Table 1). Meanwhile, there were 29,493 healthy women and 7,042 women with steatotic liver, primarily with MASLD (n = 5,733) (Table 1). Healthy Korean men were generally older, whereas those with steatotic liver were younger; no substantial age differences were observed among the MASLD, MetALD, and ALD groups. For women, no differences were observed among healthy subjects and those with MetALD and ADL. Women with MASLD were generally older than men with MASLD.

Table 1 General characteristics of the participants in the KNHANES cohort according to steatotic liver status
Table 2 General characteristics of the participants in the NHANES cohort according to steatotic liver status

There are no established HSI thresholds for determining the presence of steatotic liver in ethnic groups outside Korea. The HSI was analyzed using the threshold of 36, identical to the Korean data, in the NHANES dataset to confirm the prevalence. The prevalence rates were 79%, 14%, 6%, and 2% for KNHANES; 74%, 23%, 1%, and 1% for KoGES; and 25%, 39%, 25%, and 12% for NHANES. Despite the globally reported SLD prevalence of 20–30%, NHANES demonstrated a striking prevalence of 75%, when HSI cutoff value was set at 36 [3]. When comparing the variables used in the HSI calculation between Korea and America, a notable difference was observed in BMI. Therefore, we adopted an HSI threshold of 41 for subsequent analyses for two reasons. First, we approximated the prevalence in the Korean population (Supplementary Fig. 4). Second, we adjusted for the BMI difference, which was approximately 5, between the KNHANES and NHANES cohorts. The NHANES cohort included 3,478 healthy men and 2,863 men with steatotic liver. Among men with steatotic liver, most were categorized under MASLD (n = 1,537), followed by MetALD (n = 707) and ALD (n = 619) (Table 2). Meanwhile, there were 2,794 healthy women and 2,798 women with steatotic liver, primarily with MASLD (n = 1,259) (Table 2). Men with MetALD and ALD were generally younger, similar to those in the KNHANES cohort. Women with MASLD and ALD were generally older and younger, respectively, similar to those in the KNHANES cohort.

The KoGES cohort included 3,235 healthy men, 744 men with MASLD, 98 with MetALD, and 72 with ALD. Meanwhile, there were 3,273 healthy women, 1,291 women with MASLD, 26 with MetALD, and 5 with ALD. In the KNHANES, NHANES, and KoGES cohorts, men with MetALD and ALD were generally younger, whereas those with MASLD varied. Women with MASLD were generally older and had younger ALD patterns.

Across all cohorts, participants with steatotic liver had significantly higher BMI, WC, and TC levels than healthy subjects regardless of sex. Markers of liver injury, such as AST and ALT levels, were elevated in patients in the MASLD, MetALD, and ALD groups compared to healthy participants. The ALT/AST ratio was also consistently increased in patients in the MASLD, MetALD, and ALD groups compared with healthy participants. Blood parameters associated with hypertension, such as SBP and diastolic BP (DBP), were raised in subjects with steatotic liver compared with healthy subjects in all cohorts and regardless of sex. Dyslipidemia parameters, including TC levels, were higher in participants with steatotic liver than in healthy individuals regardless of sex. Conversely, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels were lower in participants with steatotic liver than in healthy participants in all cohorts and regardless of sex sexes. Additionally, diabetes parameters, including fasting glucose and HbA1c levels, were elevated in participants with steatotic liver compared to healthy participants in all cohorts and regardless of sex.

Associations between chronic metabolic disease and disease parameters

The prevalence of chronic diseases, such as diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia, increase annually [30,31,32]. Tracking annual prevalence trends using preprocessed cross-sectional data from the NHANES and KNHANES databases revealed an increasing prevalence of diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia over time (Supplementary Fig. 6).

Sex-specific association patterns between chronic metabolic diseases and clinical parameters were compared between the two cross-sectional cohorts. In the KNHANES cohort (Fig. 1B), hypertension in both sexes showed positive correlations with age, BMI, WC, SBP, DBP, and TG, fasting glucose, HbA1c, and AST levels and negative linear trends with TC and HDL levels. When comparing the sex-specific hypertension-related signatures in the KNHANES and NHANES cohorts, the following variables exhibited correlations independent of sex and ethnicity: age, BMI, WC, SBP, DBP, TG, fasting glucose, and HbA1c levels. In Korea, the pattern of association between liver profile and hypertension risk differed between men and women but was consistently positive in men and women in the United States. TC and HDL levels were negatively related to the prevalence of hypertension in most cases, except for women in the United States.

Dyslipidemia-related signatures largely coincide with those linked to hypertension risk, including TG, fasting glucose, and ALT levels, as well as the ALT/AST ratio, with the exception of DBP and TC. The ALT/AST ratio, which is a predictor of MASLD and IR [16, 33] exhibited a positive relationship with the ratio of dyslipidemia regardless of sex and ethnicity. Furthermore, TC levels showed a positive association with the risk of dyslipidemia in the US dataset and a negative association in the Korean cohort.

Diabetes-related signatures mostly converged with those associated with the risk of diabetes, except for DBP and the ALT/AST ratio, which exhibited a positive relationship with the hypertension ratio depending on sex.

Associations between chronic metabolic disease and hepatic steatosis in the KNHANES cohort

HSI of patients in the KNHANES cohort were transformed into octile percentiles to identify linear trends in hepatic steatosis status with the prevalence of chronic diseases. As HSI increased, all diseases exhibited monotonic escalation patterns (Fig. 2A and B).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Disease prevalence according to hepatic steatosis in the KNHANES cohort. (A, B) Chronic metabolic disease prevalence according to the hepatic steatosis index (HSI) in men (A) and women (B). (C, D) Hazard ratio of chronic metabolic disease according to steatotic liver status in multiple logistic regression analysis in men (C) and women (D). MASLD, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease; MetALD, metabolically associated alcoholic liver disease; ALD, alcoholic liver disease

After an extensive review of existing literature, age and smoking status were identified as important confounding factors that could significantly affect the relationship between steatotic liver status and chronic diseases (Supplementary Table 2). The association between steatotic liver status and chronic diseases was further assessed using a multivariable logistic regression model that adjusted for confounders such as age and smoking status. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test was performed to assess the calibration of the multivariable logistic regression model (Supplement Fig. 7A A). The observed value, represented by the blue bars, indicates the actual number of events, while the expected value, depicted by the red dots, represents the number of events predicted by the logistic regression model. Therefore, the Hosmer-Lemeshow test indicated a close correlation between observed and expected values, validating the robustness calibration of the multivariable logistic regression model in KNHANES. Among men in the KNHANES cohort, the ORs for MASLD, MetALD, and ALD were 4.232 (95% CI, 3.767–4.755), 3.647 (95% CI, 2.764–4.813), and 3.824 (95% CI, 3.356–4.357) for diabetes (Fig. 2C and D), 2.330 (95% CI, 2.108–2.576), 2.312 (95% CI, 1.829–2.921), and 3.301 (95% CI, 2.977–3.660) for hypertension, and 2.055 (95% CI, 1.848–2.285), 2.180 (95% CI, 1.706–2.787), and 2.735 (95% CI, 2.456–3.046) for dyslipidemia, respectively. Among women in the KNHANES cohort, the ORs for diabetes (MASLD > MetALD > ALD), hypertension (ALD > MetALD > MASLD), and dyslipidemia (MASLD > MeALD > ALD) were similar to those in men.

Associations between chronic metabolic disease and hepatic steatosis in the NHANES cohort

HSI in NHANES data were transformed into octile percentiles to identify linear trends in hepatic steatosis status with the prevalence of chronic diseases. The results showed that as HSI increased, all diseases exhibited monotonic escalation patterns (Fig. 3A and B).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Disease prevalence according to hepatic steatosis in the NHANES cohort. (A, B) Chronic metabolic disease prevalence according to the hepatic steatosis index (HSI) in men (A) and women (B). (C, D) Hazard ratio of chronic metabolic disease according to steatotic liver status in multiple logistic regression analysis in men (C) and women (D). MASLD, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease; MetALD, metabolically associated alcoholic liver disease; ALD, alcoholic liver disease

The association between steatotic liver and chronic diseases was assessed using a multivariate logistic regression model. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test indicated a close correlation between observed and expected values, validating the robustness calibration of the multivariable logistic regression model in NHANES(Supplement Figs. 7B and 8B). Among men in the NHANES cohort, the ORs for MASLD, MetALD, and ALD were 1.524 (95% CI: 1.269–1.830), 1.328 (95% CI: 1.009–1.748), and 1.893 (95% CI: 1.438–2.492) for diabetes (Fig. 3C and D), 1.960 (95% CI, 1.713–2.242), 2.215 (95% CI, 1.848–2.656), and 2.166 (95% CI, 1.783–2.631) for hypertension, and 1.621 (95% CI, 1.423–1.846), 1.770 (95% CI, 1.484–2.111), and 1.778 (95% CI, 1.472–2.147) for dyslipidemia, respectively. Among women in the NHANES cohort, the ORs for diabetes, hypertension (ALD > MASLD > MetALD), and dyslipidemia (MetALD > MASLD > ALD) were similar to those in men.

We also analyzed the association between alcohol consumption and the prevalence of chronic metabolic diseases and found no significant increase in the KNHANES or NHANES cohorts. However, in the KNHANES cohort, an inverse relationship was observed among women, wherein higher alcohol consumption was associated with a lower prevalence of chronic metabolic diseases (Supplementary Fig. 8).

Risks of chronic metabolic diseases in SLD

To examine the causal relationship between chronic diseases and steatotic liver status, we used longitudinal data from the KoGES cohort and performed Cox regression analysis. The Schoenfeld analysis was utilized to verify the proportional hazards assumption, the basic tenet of the Cox proportional hazards model. A Schoenfeld p-value exceeding 0.05 confirms that the variable’s effect does not vary with time, thereby satisfying the proportional hazards assumption(Supplementary Fig. 10). Figure 4 shows the causal effects of the steatotic liver status on the development of chronic metabolic diseases. To predict the development of chronic metabolic diseases in patients with steatotic liver disease, we used data from 2 years.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Causal relationship between chronic metabolic disease and steatotic liver status in the KoGES cohort. (A) Hazard ratio of chronic metabolic disease according to steatotic liver status in Cox regression analysis in men. (B) Hazard ratio of chronic metabolic disease according to steatotic liver status in Cox regression analysis in women. Causality: Cox regression analysis was performed to assess the relationship between baseline steatotic liver status and the incidence of chronic metabolic diseases over the 2-year follow-up period

Based on the 2-year data, we calculated the risk of early development of chronic metabolic diseases. Both MASLD and MetALD were significant predictors of diabetes in men (HR, 4.076; 95% CI, 2.172–7.647 and HR, 8.012; 95% CI, 2.365–27.139, respectively) and women (HR, 6.450; 95% CI, 5.072–8.202 and HR, 10.218; 95% CI, 4.130–25.285, respectively). For hypertension, MetALD was a significant predictor in men (HR, 3.637; 95% CI, 1.111–11.900), whereas MASLD was a significant predictor in women (HR, 2.662; 95% CI, 1.803–3.930). For dyslipidemia, the 2-year data showed no significant predictive value based on steatotic liver status in either sex (Fig. 4A and B). Regarding overall causality, among men (Fig. 4A), the HRs for MASLD, MetALD, and ALD were 4.354 (95% CI, 3.371–5.624), 6.037 (95% CI, 3.654–9.975), and 5.831 (95% CI, 3.343–10.171) for diabetes, 1.517 (95% CI, 1.257–1.830), 2.069 (95% CI, 1.319–3.245), and 2.050 (95% CI, 1.242–3.383) for hypertension, and 1.398 (95% CI, 1.120–1.743), 2.109 (95% CI, 1.338–3.325), and 2.867 (95% CI, 1.818–4.522) for dyslipidemia, respectively. Meanwhile, the number of women with ALD was insufficient to provide reliable HR estimates; however, their HRs for diabetes and dyslipidemia were similar to those in men.

Discussion

In this study, we comprehensively examined the prevalence and causality of chronic metabolic diseases, such as diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia, in relation to steatotic liver status. We used cross-sectional data from KNHANES and NHANES and longitudinal data from KoGES. The prevalence of chronic metabolic diseases (diabetes, dyslipidaemia and hypertension) has increased over the decade in KNHANES and over the two decades in NHANES (Supplementary Fig. 11). Among men, the association between chronic metabolic diseases and liver injury markers was inconsistently significant. However, in women, positive correlations were observed between these conditions and AST and ALT levels, suggesting a stronger association between liver injury and chronic conditions (Fig. 1B and C). The prevalence of chronic diseases also significantly increased with HSI in both men and women in the KNHANES and NHANES cohorts (Figs. 2A and B and 3A, and 3B), highlighting the critical role of liver health in the management of metabolic diseases. Logistic regression analysis confirmed these associations, with higher HSI correlating with an increased risk of chronic metabolic disease (Figs. 2C and D and 3C, and 3D). MetALD emerged as a significant predictor, underscoring the need for further attention to this newly defined category.

A subsequent analysis of the data, focusing on short-term (2-year) causality, revealed that metabolic disease has distinct sex-specific influences on hypertension. Among men, MetALD was significantly associated with hypertension, whereas MASLD showed no such relationship. Conversely, in women, MASLD exhibited a significant association with hypertension. These findings underscore the potential sex-specific interplay between SLD subtypes and hypertension risk. This observation is further corroborated by earlier studies conducted in Japanese cohorts, which have also demonstrated differences in steatotic liver disease status between men and women [34, 35]. Further research is warranted to elucidate the underlying biological mechanisms driving these sex-specific associations and to inform the development of targeted strategies for the prevention and management of hypertension in patients with different SLD subtypes.

The identification of MetALD as a significant predictor of diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia suggests the necessity of integrating liver health assessments into routine metabolic disease management. Current clinical guidelines predominantly focus on non-alcoholic steatotic liver disease (MASLD), often overlooking the impact of moderate alcohol consumption on liver pathology. Our findings indicate that clinicians should adopt a more nuanced approach to liver disease diagnosis, recognizing MetALD as a distinct entity that requires tailored intervention strategies [36]. Recently, Gratacós-Ginès, Jordi et al. reported the clinical implications of MetALD, estimating its prevalence to be between 1.7% and 17%, emphasizing the need for early screening and detection. In addition, emerging evidence suggests that many drugs studied for MASLD, including glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and fibroblast growth factor 21 analogues [37]. For instance, patients presenting with metabolic syndrome and moderate alcohol consumption may benefit from earlier screening for liver fibrosis and hepatocellular injury markers, even in the absence of elevated transaminases [38]. This approach may facilitate earlier identification and management of liver-related complications, ultimately reducing the progression to cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma.

Furthermore, the strong association between MetALD and chronic metabolic diseases may be attributed to the dual influence of alcohol consumption and metabolic dysfunction. Alcohol, even at moderate levels, can exacerbate hepatic fat accumulation by altering lipid metabolism and impairing mitochondrial β-oxidation [39]. This synergistic effect, when combined with underlying metabolic risk factors such as obesity, insulin resistance, and dyslipidemia, accelerates hepatic inflammation and fibrosis [40]. Additionally, alcohol can upregulate pro-inflammatory cytokines and oxidative stress pathways, further contributing to liver injury and systemic metabolic disturbances [41]. The interplay between these mechanisms highlights why MetALD may present a more aggressive clinical course compared to MASLD or ALD alone.

A comparison of the two cohorts revealed some notable differences. In the KNHANES cohort, the prevalence of chronic metabolic diseases did not increase with alcohol consumption. Interestingly, higher alcohol consumption was associated with a lower prevalence of these diseases among women, suggesting a possible protective effect of moderate alcohol consumption. However, this was not observed in the NHANES cohort (Supplementary Fig. 7), suggesting possible differences in the population characteristics or lifestyle factors between Korean and American adults.

Using longitudinal data from the KoGES cohort, we performed Cox regression analyses to explore causal relationships (Fig. 4). MetALD was a significant predictor of diabetes in both men and women, with the HRs indicating a strong association. MetALD is a significant predictor of hypertension in men, highlighting its role in the progression of cardiovascular diseases. Predictions for dyslipidemia varied, with MetALD showing significant associations in both men and women, although the magnitudes were different. These findings are consistent with the notion that alcohol-related hepatic inflammation, coupled with insulin resistance, contributes to endothelial dysfunction and hypertension progression [42]. The unique metabolic profile of MetALD underscores the importance of its recent categorization. This group, which is characterized by specific alcohol consumption patterns coupled with metabolic risk factors, highlights the complex interplay between lifestyle factors and liver health. Our findings suggest that MetALD is not just an intermediate category but a distinct entity with specific clinical implications.

From a public health perspective, the recognition of MetALD as a significant contributor to chronic metabolic diseases underscores the need for updated screening protocols and preventive strategies. Public health policies aimed at reducing the prevalence of steatotic liver disease should not only target high-risk MASLD populations but also include individuals with moderate alcohol consumption [43]. Incorporating MetALD screening into national health programs could lead to earlier detection of at-risk populations and facilitate timely intervention. Additionally, educational campaigns highlighting the risks of alcohol-related liver disease in the context of metabolic dysfunction could enhance public awareness and promote healthier lifestyle choices, ultimately reducing the burden of MetALD and its associated comorbidities.

Given the limited therapeutic options currently available for steatotic liver disease, it is important to deal with closely related chronic metabolic diseases, such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes to alleviate steatosis. Public health strategies should prioritize policies that promote healthier lifestyle choices, such as reducing the consumption of high-sugar foods and restricting access to hepatotoxic substances, including alcohol, for the management of MASLD [44, 45]. Recent meta-analysis reported that exercise training showed significant improvement in liver function markers in MASLD patients [46]. These interventions not only have the potential to reduce steatosis but also to lessen the broader socioeconomic costs of managing chronic diseases associated with metabolic dysfunction. Recently, Liwei et al. proposed a novel risk prediction model for the 2-year risk of MASLD in a non-obese population using a Chinese cohort [10], highlighting the need for further research to develop comprehensive risk stratification models for MASLD, MetALD and ALD.

This study had several limitations. First, the cross-sectional nature of the KNHANES and NHANES data limits their ability to establish causality. Although longitudinal data from the KoGES cohort provided insights into causal relationships, the length of follow-up may not fully capture the long-term progression of liver disease and chronic metabolic conditions. Second, the reliance on self-reported data on alcohol consumption and other lifestyle factors may introduce recall bias, potentially affecting the accuracy of categorization into MASLD, MetALD, and ALD. Thirdly, our study used the HSI to diagnose fatty liver, but this tool does not have clear cut-off values to measure the severity of the disease. Also, because relatively low numbers of women in our study consumed alcohol, we did not do further subgroup analyses based on disease severity or sex. Future studies should aim to address these limitations by incorporating more robust methodologies and exploring tailored clinical interventions based on MetALD. In addition, further research into the molecular mechanisms underlying MetALD progression and the identification of specific biomarkers could facilitate the development of novel therapeutic strategies and the development of risk prediction models for MetALD.

Conclusions

In conclusion, this study underscores the intertwined nature of liver and metabolic health, with a particular emphasis on the role of MetALD. The significant association between MetALD and chronic metabolic diseases highlights the need for integrated management strategies that address both liver health and metabolic risk factors. In addition, the high prevalence of SLD in the US cohort compared to Korea suggests the necessity for population-specific diagnostic criteria and reinforces the need for standardized but adaptable screening thresholds.

Data availability

All data used in the paper are publicly available.

Abbreviations

SLD:

Steatotic liver disease

MetALD:

Metabolically associated alcoholic liver disease

KNHANES:

Korea National Healthy and Nutrition Examination Survey

NHANES:

National Healthy and Nutrition Examination Survey

KoGES:

Korean Genome and Epidemiology study

MASLD:

Metabolic dysfunction–associated SLD

HSI:

Hepatic steatosis index

ALD:

Alcoholic related liver disease

SLD:

Steatotic liver disease

NAFLD:

Non–alcoholic fatty liver disease

CVD:

Cardiovascular disease

WC:

Waist circumference

BMI:

Body mass index

SBP:

Systolic blood pressure

DBP:

Diastolic blood pressure

TG:

Triglyceride

TC:

Total cholesterol

HbA1c:

HemoglbinA1c

AST:

Aspartate aminotransferase

ALT:

Alanine aminotransferase

ORs:

Odds ratios

HRs:

Hazard ratios

HDL:

High–density lipoprotein

References

  1. Kasper P, Martin A, Lang S, Kuetting F, Goeser T, Demir M. Steffen H-MJCric: NAFLD and cardiovascular diseases: a clinical review. 2021, 110:921–37.

  2. Li Z, Shen Y, Li Z, Cao D, Hu Y. Is MetALD an independent risk factor of all-cause mortality? A meta-analysis of 164,694 individuals from the real world. J Hepatol 2024.

  3. Kalligeros M, Vassilopoulos A, Vassilopoulos S, Victor DW, Mylonakis E, Noureddin M. Prevalence of steatotic liver disease (MASLD, MetALD, and ALD) in the United States: NHANES 2017–2020. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024;22:1330–2. e1334.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lazarus JV, Mark HE, Anstee QM, Arab JP, Batterham RL, Castera L, Cortez-Pinto H, Crespo J, Cusi K, Dirac MAJNRG. Hepatology: Advancing the global public health agenda for NAFLD: a consensus statement. 2022, 19:60–78.

  5. Rinella ME, Lazarus JV, Ratziu V, Francque SM, Sanyal AJ, Kanwal F, Romero D, Abdelmalek MF, Anstee QM, Arab JPJH. A multisociety Delphi consensus statement on new fatty liver disease nomenclature. 2023, 78:1966–86.

  6. Israelsen M, Torp N, Johansen S, Thiele M, Krag A. MetALD: new opportunities to understand the role of alcohol in steatotic liver disease. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023;8:866–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Petrie E, Gray M, Bril F. Metabolic characteristics of patients with MetALD: caveats of a new definition. Liver Int. 2024;44:2929–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen L, Tao X, Zeng M, Mi Y, Xu L. Clinical and histological features under different nomenclatures of fatty liver disease: NAFLD, MAFLD, MASLD and MetALD. J Hepatol. 2024;80:e64–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Miwa T, Tajirika S, Imamura N, Adachi M, Horita R, Hanai T, Fukao T, Shimizu M, Yamamoto M. Prevalence of steatotic liver disease based on a new nomenclature in the Japanese population: a health checkup-based cross-sectional study. J Clin Med. 2024;13:1158.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ji L, Cai X, Bai Y, Li T. Application of a novel prediction model for predicting 2-year risk of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in the non-obese population with normal blood lipid levels: a large prospective cohort study from China. Int J Gen Med 2021:2909–22.

  11. Kim Y, Han B-G. Epidemiology KGJIjo: cohort profile: the Korean genome and epidemiology study (KoGES) consortium. 2017, 46:e20–20.

  12. Oh K, Kim Y, Kweon S, Kim S, Yun S, Park S, Lee Y-K, Kim Y, Park O, Jeong EKJE. health: Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 20th anniversary: accomplishments and future directions. 2021, 43.

  13. Yun S, Oh KJE. health: The Korea national health and nutrition examination survey data linked cause of death data. 2022, 44.

  14. Lau DT, Ahluwalia N, Fryar CD, Kaufman M, Arispe IE, Paulose-Ram RJAJPH. Data Related to Social Determinants of Health Captured in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Volume 113. American Public Health Association; 2023. pp. 1290–5.

  15. Ale L, Gentleman R, Sonmez TF, Sarkar D, Endres CJD. nhanesA: achieving transparency and reproducibility in NHANES research. 2024, 2024:baae028.

  16. Priego-Parra BA, Triana-Romero A, Martínez-Pérez GP, Reyes-Diaz SA, Ordaz-Alvarez HR, Bernal-Reyes R, Icaza-Chávez ME, Martínez-Vázquez SE, Cano-Contreras AD. Vivanco-Cid HJAoH: hepatic steatosis index (HSI): a Valuable Biomarker in subjects with metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver Disease (MAFLD). 2024, 29:101391.

  17. Chang JW, Lee HW, Kim BK, Park JY, Ahn SH, Han K-H, Kim SUJG. Liver: hepatic steatosis index in the detection of fatty liver in patients with chronic hepatitis B receiving antiviral therapy. 2021, 15:117.

  18. Lee T, Chung T-HJSR. Comparative analysis of the relationship between four hepatic steatosis indices and muscle mass. 2023, 13:1645.

  19. Miwa T, Tajirika S, Imamura N, Adachi M, Horita R, Hanai T, Ng CH, Siddiqui MS, Fukao T, Shimizu M. Usefulness of health checkup-based indices in identifying metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease. JGH Open. 2024;8:e13110.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Murayama K, Okada M, Tanaka K, Inadomi C, Yoshioka W, Kubotsu Y, Yada T, Isoda H, Kuwashiro T, Oeda S. Prediction of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease using noninvasive and non-imaging procedures in Japanese health checkup examinees. Diagnostics. 2021;11:132.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Sinn DH, Kang D, Guallar E, Choi SC, Hong YS, Park Y, Cho J, Gwak G-YJP. Regression of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is associated with reduced risk of incident diabetes: a longitudinal cohort study. 2023, 18:e0288820.

  22. Shim YN, Choi HJ, Jung D, Jo MS, Oh HJJKJFP. Association between muscle mass deficits and the non-alcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score in adults without central obesity. 2021, 11:345–51.

  23. Zhang Y, Shi R, Yu L, Ji L, Li M, Hu FJDT. Establishment of a risk prediction model for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in type 2 diabetes. 2020, 11:2057–73.

  24. He X, Huang X, Qian Y, Sun TJFE. A non-linear relationship between triglyceride glucose waist circumference and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in a Japanese population: a secondary analysis. 2023, 14:1188214.

  25. Lu S, Xie Q, Kuang M, Hu C, Li X, Yang H, Sheng G, Xie G, Zou YJJTM. Lipid metabolism, BMI and the risk of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in the general population: evidence from a mediation analysis. 2023, 21:192.

  26. Qian Y, Sun B, Zhang Y, Zhang M, Jiao X, Lai L, Yang WJAPM. A clinical and laboratory-based nomogram for predicting nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in non-diabetic adults: a cross-sectional study. 2022, 11:2349–59.

  27. Jeong S, Kim K, Chang J, Choi S, Kim SM, Son JS, Lee G, Kim W. Park SMJAotm: development of a simple nonalcoholic fatty liver disease scoring system indicative of metabolic risks and insulin resistance. 2020, 8.

  28. Weng H-Y, Hsueh Y-H, Messam LLM, Hertz-Picciotto, IJAjoe. Methods of covariate selection: directed acyclic graphs and the change-in-estimate procedure. 2009, 169:1182–1190.

  29. Kalligeros M, Vassilopoulos A, Vassilopoulos S, Victor DW, Mylonakis E, Noureddin MJCG, Hepatology. Prevalence of steatotic liver disease (MASLD, MetALD, and ALD) in the United States: NHANES 2017–2020. 2024, 22:1330–1332. e1334.

  30. Li H, Ge JJIH, Vasculature. Cardiovascular diseases in China: current status and future perspectives. 2015, 6:25–31.

  31. Noh J, Han K-D, Ko S-H, Ko KS, Park C-YJS. Trends in the pervasiveness of type 2 diabetes, impaired fasting glucose and co-morbidities during an 8-year-follow-up of nationwide Korean population. 2017, 7:46656.

  32. Sekizawa Y, Konishi Y, Ikari HJS-LS, Health tC-OP, Policy P. Who Are Free from Hypertension, Dyslipidemia, and Diabetes Mellitus in the Middle-Aged and Elderly Population of Japan? 2022:275–302.

  33. Han SK, Seo MJ, Lee T, Kim MY. Effectiveness of the ALT/AST ratio for predicting insulin resistance in a Korean population: a large-scale, cross-sectional cohort study. PLoS ONE. 2024;19:e0303333.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Miwa T, Francisque C, Tajirika S, Hanai T, Imamura N, Adachi M, Horita R, Menezes LJ, Kawaguchi T, Shimizu MJHR. Impact of body fat accumulation on metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in Japanese male young adults. 2023, 53:691–700.

  35. Omagari K, Kadokawa Y, Masuda JI, Egawa I, Sawa T, Hazama H, Ohba K, Isomoto H, Mizuta Y. Hayashida KJJog, hepatology: fatty liver in non-alcoholic non‐overweight Japanese adults: incidence and clinical characteristics. 2002, 17:1098–105.

  36. Eslam M, Sanyal AJ, George J, Sanyal A, Neuschwander-Tetri B, Tiribelli C, Kleiner DE, Brunt E, Bugianesi E. Yki-Järvinen H: MAFLD: a consensus-driven proposed nomenclature for metabolic associated fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2020;158:1999–2014. e1991.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Gratacós-Ginès J, Ariño S, Sancho-Bru P, Bataller R, Pose EJJR. MetALD: Clinical aspects, pathophysiology and treatment. 2024:101250.

  38. O’shea RS, Dasarathy S, McCullough AJ. Diseases PGCotAAftSoL, Gastroenterology tPPCotACo: alcoholic liver disease. Hepatology. 2010;51:307–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. You M, Arteel GE. Effect of ethanol on lipid metabolism. J Hepatol. 2019;70:237–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Tilg H, Moschen AR. Evolution of inflammation in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: the multiple parallel hits hypothesis. Hepatology. 2010;52:1836–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Brunt EM, Wong VW-S, Nobili V, Day CP, Sookoian S, Maher JJ, Bugianesi E, Sirlin CB, Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Rinella ME. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Nat Reviews Disease Primers. 2015;1:1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kim SK, Hong S-H, Chung J-H, Cho KB. Association between alcohol consumption and metabolic syndrome in a community-based cohort of Korean adults. Med Sci Monitor: Int Med J Experimental Clin Res. 2017;23:2104.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Sanyal AJ, Van Natta ML, Clark J, Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Diehl A, Dasarathy S, Loomba R, Chalasani N, Kowdley K, Hameed B. Prospective study of outcomes in adults with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:1559–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Khodami B, Hatami B, Yari Z, Alavian SM, Sadeghi A, Varkaneh HK, Santos HO, Hekmatdoost AJEJCN. Effects of a low free sugar diet on the management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a randomized clinical trial. 2022, 76:987–94.

  45. Hallsworth K, Adams LAJJR. Lifestyle modification in NAFLD/NASH: Facts and Figs. 2019, 1:468–479.

  46. Hejazi K, Hackett DJJ. Effect of exercise on liver function and insulin resistance markers in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. 2023, 12:3011.

Download references

Funding

This research was supported by the Bio & Medical Technology Development Program of the NRF funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (No. RS-2024-00440824). and a grant of the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (No. RS-2024-00439685), and a National Research Council of Science & Technology (NST) grant by the Korean government (MSIT) (No. CAP23021-000).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Chang-Myung Oh (Writing– original draft: Supporting; Writing– review and editing: lead).Tae Sic Lee (Data curation: Lead; Writing– review and editing: support)Yeongmin Kim (Data curation: Supporting; Writing: original draft: Lead; Writing: review and editing: Supporting).

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Tae Sic Lee or Chang-Myung Oh.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (20221201-BR-69-02-02).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Conflict of interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, Y., Lee, T.S. & Oh, CM. Metabolic outcomes in non-alcoholic and alcoholic steatotic liver disease among Korean and American adults. BMC Gastroenterol 25, 110 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12876-025-03687-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12876-025-03687-4

Keywords